August 28, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

Obama’s influence on masculinity: men should talk about internalized sexism

Please visit BlogHer for outstanding video (Joe Trippi, women of color, CA Secretary of State) and blogging coverage of the Democratic National Convention, but in the meantime, I’m grafting this fantastic interview by Maria Niles of Chris Rabb of Afro-Netizen because it directly and specifically refutes some of the stereotypes described and maintained by commenters (sorry, John, I do mean you, among others) in this post about whether John McCain’s superficial tough guy image outstrips Barack Obama’s more cosmopolitan and dare some of us wrote near-metrosexual presentation.

Again, please listen to the entire interview - Rabb does a great job making the case about men’s role in the gender politics and moving forward. I’d transcribe it because he says so many excellent things, but I am a lousy transcriptionist, unlike the old stereotype of women.

by Jill Miller Zimon at2:29 PM under barack obama, gender, michelle obama, politics, sexism, social issues, wh2008, women (Comments)


August 26, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

On the media-whipped PUMA phenom & a one-word directive: CHILL

I like Rebecca Traister’s piece on the Party Unity My Ass loyalists in Salon very much but I love this woman.

The setting:

Whether they knew it or not, the PUMAs who had congregated next to the MSNBC stage were making the night of the man who has done everything in his power to destroy their purported heroine. They held aloft Clinton signs and hand-markered cards reading “Stop Delegate Intimidation!” and “South Jersey PUMA.” At one point, three women and three men holding “McCain” signs started a melodic chorus of “Clintons for McCain, sweetie, Clintons for McCain, sweetie,” in reference to Barack Obama’s bad habit of referring to women by that diminutive. Next to them, a man in an Obama hat shouted, “You’re all irrelevant! Jesus!”

But irrelevant is not how the protesters will be portrayed by a media that has been salivating over the possible disruption of the Democratic convention — by angry, broom-riding succubi! — for weeks. Never mind that there were probably no more than 50 shouting PUMAs. Never mind that every national political convention in modern history becomes a locus for vocal agitators. Never mind that over the weekend, antiwar protests had been larger. Never mind that in three days in Denver I had not spotted a single PUMA or Hillary protester until I found where Chris Matthews was broadcasting. Never mind the guy in the toilet outfit. To hear Matthews, and the talking heads at CNN tell it, these demonstrators were “ground zero” in a rift that could potentially destroy the Democratic Party and ruin its national convention.

And from the woman I love, Marie Wilson, founder of The White House Project:

“There is such a fear of women coming into power, that when they protest, they are given more weight,” said Marie Wilson, head of the White House Project, before speaking as part of the Unconventional Women’s programming, acknowledging the likelihood of protest. “Just the fact of women saying they support their candidate and want to make their voices heard sounds more scary than it would be if it were guys. That’s just part of backlash. But come on. When women gather around a water fountain, men get scared. People oughta just chill.”

Wilson acknowledges that there will be residual tension at the convention. But she sees the discord as a positive thing, a perhaps painful step in the right direction. “Putting issues on the table” — as opposed to keeping political frustrations pent up — “is what is going to bring people together.” Wilson believes that in the wake of Hillary’s run, “we are in the middle of a revolution. Women are stepping up and taking power.” She said her organization, which encourages women to seek elected office, has seen a 61 percent increase in participation in the past year. [emphasis mine]

Count 29 year old Hough resident, Stephanie Howse, Cleveland’s newest city council member, as part of that 61%.

Much of my online day yesterday was spent saying much of the same thing, which is that the number of voters who continue to act as though they can threaten the democracy that kept this country together in 2000 after Antonin Scalia made George Bush president is most likely statistically comparable to the usual number of voters in a presidential election year who don’t “get in line” - and maybe even smaller. We don’t know because no one is measuring that - hmm, why do you think that might be?

If you don’t believe me, you can hear Markos of Daily Kos and John Podesta, among others, say it on NPR. And although I can’t remember specifically, I know Dan Moulthrop and his guests went over this point too yesterday morning with at least one caller. (I have to add - neither of those shows had a single woman on the panel, but that’s another post.)

The difference this year, when it comes to those who don’t want to support the nominee?

Chris Matthews forgetting he is or ever was a journalist - and that men get scared thing Wilson references.  But Matthews is only the most obvious example of this media-ready explosion of expression, and the netroots have plenty of upshoots in the same vein.

The voters who are defiant in their depression and anger over Hillary Clinton not being on the ticket come by it organically, unquestionably.  These voters are unlikely to be the ones who are so much in the center that they can come to see John McCain as the moderate maverick he presented as in 2000 and vote for him now.  The problem is, they are being fed and used and portrayed by opportunists of all stripes, not only Carly Fiorina and John McCain, as if they are those voters who could be swayed (and Fiorina is a squirrel banging her head against the cage - these voters, especially the women, are never going to vote for McCain - he simply is not what they want - all they want it Clinton, end of story).

Yet, what confounds me most in the continuation and choice of actions determined by defiance is understanding how voters who are otherwise intelligent and rational in choosing an excellent candidate in Hillary Clinton can now become individuals who will ignore the illogic behind their continued push toward goals that are not, even in a Dennis Kucinich world, achievable.

And I’m someone who wrote, repeatedly, about letting these voters have their say, get it out, be listened to and learned from. Even as the reality became then and is now that Hillary Clinton is not going to be president this year.

Not.Gonna.Happen.

And now, disruption, protests and stunts, especially in the face of strong statements from Clinton herself, project nothing but pure narcissism. Listen to Clinton:

I consider Bill Clinton to be one of the most narcissistic people on the face of the Earth, but not Hillary.  Whatever inner glee voters (especially those who never before would have voted for McCain and insist that they will refuse to vote for Obama) think Clinton may find in the PUMA protests, how do you think she’s going to feel as a sitting senator who has to work under a McCain administration delivered to her by…her own supporters?

Again - if people were smart enough to vote for Clinton in the primary - and I did - then they should be smart enough now to realize that, as Marie Wilson says, they need to chill.

And go attend a White House Project Go Run! training so that they can be the next female presidential candidate.

by Jill Miller Zimon at2:22 PM under barack obama, democrats, elections, gender, hillary clinton, leadership, media, politics, predictions, sexism, voting, wh2008, women (Comments)


August 25, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

[video] Obama’s McCain Don’t Know Much ‘Bout ad

Ayup.

If it really feels lousy to vote for Obama because Hillary isn’t the nominee, I appreciate that - it really felt lousy to me to vote for Hillary in the primary, because I didn’t like either Clinton or Obama. But I did it because, well - watch that video again.

But, if you think you felt lousy when HRC suspended her campaign and are considering a protest vote for John McCain?

Just imagine how you’re going to feel on November 5 if John McCain wins, or, worse yet, is inaugurated in January 2009.

by Jill Miller Zimon at4:54 PM under barack obama, campaigning, democrats, elections, leadership, politics, predictions, sexism, social issues, voting, wh2008, women (Comments)


August 3, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

Being anti-racist is more than just saying, “Hey! That’s racist!”

Just like being a feminist isn’t just about saying, “Hey! That’s sexist!”

But what does it mean, what does it take, to be an ally to an oppressed population when you don’t belong to the oppressed group?

I don’t know, exactly, and several people who are POC will tell you just how clueless I still am, but they’re also the people I’m learning from and I’m grateful. You’ll find many of their blogs in my sidebar, as well as in my RSS reader which I read even before the Ohio blogs folder in my Bloglines account, everyday.

If you want to read about race and talk about race, then you need to learn about how it impacts people who’ve lived it their whole life and who can help you learn about allies and what allies can do. It goes way beyond, and for some people doesn’t even include, supporting Barack Obama or Hillary Clinton.

A description of just some of the excellent blogs by people of color or other marginalized groups, with information when I have a personal take:

A Book Without a Cover
My co-panelist and roomie at BlogHer, Adele Nieves, writes this blog and is almost singlehandedly responsible for my watershed moments related to awakening to the enormous POC blogosphere out there, among many other revelations she’s triggered for me.  I owe her a lot.

Angry Black Bitch

Aunt Jemima’s Revenge

The Bilerico Project
I first got to the Bilerico Project by way of a review of WAM!2008 by Jessica Hoffman.  She also wrote what some consider a seminal article about white feminists (a lot of the themes go way past my knowledge but I’m learning/I’ve learned that the content has a lot to do with something called intersectionality and I believe that that concept itself is somewhat controversial in terms of how it’s applied to feminism and racism, among other constructs).

Black Women Vote

Black Women, Blow the Trumpet
Professor Kim Pearson suggested this one on her own blog I believe.

Clueless White Woman
Written by a white woman who has sought to be an ally (and is I believe).

Culture Kitchen
Liza Sabater writes this blog and is one of the most prolific and sought-after WOC bloggers from what I gather. I’ve read about a number of important incidents and opinions on her blogs first and I really enjoy the strength with which she writes.

Cynematic/Pillowbook
One of my co-panelists on the BlogHer Race and Gender panel.

Diary of a Content Black Woman
I love this one.

Echidne of the Snakes
Echidne is one of the most established blogs by a WOC.

Jack and Jill Politics
JJP is a staple of many political bloggers across the spectrum and deservedly so.

La Chola
This blog is written by BrownFemiPower.  She is widely revered among people who blog and are active in the POC blogosphere as one of the best POC writers and bloggers.  Her blog is also another from which I’ve read about incidences you’d think we’d know about but don’t and should.

Mixed Race America
Another blog I learned about by asking people I trust re: which POC blogs should I be reading.

Pam’s House Blend
Another absolute must-read, like Jack and Jill Politics.  When something hits the fan - like the Michelle Obama Daily Kos lynching image, I specifically pray that one or more of these (Prof. Kim Pearson is another one, and What Tami Said or What About Our Daughters or Racialicious) have written about it.  To analogize, when something happens with Jews or Israel, I don’t like or need non-Jews who want to appear or sound all empathetic to be getting enraged if it’s not something that’s enraging me.  Sure - they’re entitle to their opinion, but I’m not going to be told that I should be outraged, thank you. I can figure that out on my own - and by doing some surveying of how others, far more directly affected than I am, are reacting.

Professor Kim’s News and Notes
Prof. Kim is great - is a contributing editor at BlogHer.

Racialicious
Another recommended to me blog that I find to be excellent.

What About Our Daughters
Gena McCauley I believe is her name - she organized or had a big hand in Blogging While Brown.  Great blog.

What Tami Said
I love Tami.  She’s another person to whom you’ll say, thank you for blogging.

WOC PhD
Excellent blog.

Women Wired In
The blog of Shireen Mitchell of Digital Sistas who has a connection with our Bill Callahan.

Worker Bees
This blog is written by one of the three co-founders of BlogHer, Elisa Camahort.

There are some excellent WOC bloggers on BlogHer who’ve been writing about race lately and the threads have some fantastic discusions.  Here’s a sample (and it really is just a sample):

Kelly Wickham of Mocha Momma and Rita Arens of Surrender, Dorothy get it in on big time here.

Laina D just got the party started on this thread.

And Nordette does so here.

Last but not least, Clueless White Woman - the sister I never had. ;)

One of the things I love about BlogHer is that, because it’s such a large community and conversation is so highly valued, it is really easy to say stupid things, say that you know you might be saying something stupid and people will not come to your rescue but will say, well, yeah, - you’re right that is stupid - but here’s why and what’s going on and where to go with that.

Anyway - happy reading.  I couldn’t decide whether to have a sidebar header for Women of Color or People of Color but i just really want to point out these resources and writings - they make the blogosphere so rich and especially for Ohio political bloggers, who count no people of color that I know of as part of the sphere - and if there are some, please, let us know.

by Jill Miller Zimon at3:57 AM under blogging, blogher, blogroll, civil rights, culture, debates, ohio, politics, race, sexism, social issues, women (Comments)


August 1, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

Mini-meta commentary on Ludacris’ lyrical political commentary

I saw this predictable debate begin a few nights ago and immediately started to read up on it:

Wednesday night, from What About Our Daughters

Jack and Jill Politics: Ludacris “helps” Obama Pretend Like He’s Never Met Ludacris

And this, from Ohio’s own Dave of NixGuy, which, when you read the comments, could not be a better explanation of the damage Ludacris’ attention-getting slur of Hillary Clinton that put Barack Obama in the position of having to pretend like he’s never met Ludacris can do.  Sure, you can suggest that those commenters wouldn’t be voting for Obama anyway. But it’s the same problem with the New Yorker cover - is it really necessary? Is it the only way to make a point - and I’m not even sure what Ludacris’ point is - we know people think HRC was a b***** and we know that now, well, she’s going to and needs to find other ambitions that will help this country (and she will, I have no doubt).

Talk about people hating on Obama and loving to hate on him and spread and perpetuate the hate.

BlogHer posted Erika Alexander’s take, Stop the Silence on Sexism and it’s a good one too.

And finally, for now, Amie Newman’s piece on RHReality Check, Ludacris’ Lyrics: Misogyny, Racism and The Reality of America.

This list is far from exhaustive and I’d urge you to check out more blogs, especially by bloggers of color, men and women, to get a feel for how it’s going down.

by Jill Miller Zimon at1:47 PM under barack obama, blogging, campaigning, culture, elections, marketing, media, music, politics, race, sexism, social issues, wh2008, women, writing (Comments)


July 28, 2008

Writes Like She Talks

WritesLikeSheTalks

Michelle Obama unveils Blueprint for America’s Working Women and Families

Read it for yourself, and later today, I’m told, there will be video of the announcement, which occurred in Chicago just about 20 minutes ago.

From the inbox:

Michelle Obama will address a gathering of Women for Obama in Chicago on Monday.  There, she will discuss the campaign’s success in reaching women across the country, and discuss why her husband, Democratic Presidential Candidate Barack Obama, will be a champion in addressing the unique challenges facing working women and families.   Mrs. Obama will also unveil a Blueprint for America’s Working Women and Families, detailing Barack Obama’s agenda to help women balance work and family, to keep themselves and their families healthy, and to prosper in a changing economy.

Michelle Obama kicked off the Women for Obama program in Chicago in April 2007.  Since then, Women for Obama has created a nationwide network of tens of thousands of women working to educate and empower themselves on the issues that are most important to women and families.  Throughout the primary, the group has played a key role in Senator Obama’s campaign through its fundraising, grassroots activity and online organizing efforts.

“We know the importance of women’s voices and votes in this election cannot be overstated, and I am so proud of the progress Women for Obama has made over the last year, bringing the issues that are most important to women and families to the center of this campaign,” said Michelle Obama.  “As President, Barack will change Washington so that instead of just talking about family values; we actually have policies that value families.  Policies that make it easier for working parents to support, care for, and raise their families; policies that no longer force working women to choose between their kids and their careers.  Barack understands the struggles working women and families face every day, because the women he loves most in the world have gone through it.  That’s why he carries our stories – and the stories of women he’s met all across America – with him every day.”

This luncheon, benefiting the Obama Victory Fund, will take place at the Palmer House Hilton in Chicago on Monday.

I’ve browsed the Blueprint and here’s a list of the topics covered:

  1. Fight for pay equity
  2. Making Work Pay for Working Families
  3. Increase the Minimum Wage to $9.50 by 2011
  4. Expand the Earned Income Tax Credit
  5. Provide a Child and Dependent Care Tax Credit to an Additional 7.5 Million Women
  6. Create Automatic Workplace Pensions
  7. Expand Retirement Savings Incentives for Working Families
  8. Expand Family and Medical Leave Act
  9. Encourage States to Adopt Paid Leave
  10. Expand Paid Sick Days to 22 Million Women
  11. Protect Against Caregiver Discrimination
  12. Expand Flexible Work Arrangements
  13. Expand High Quality Afterschool and Summer Learning Opportunities
  14. Fix the Nation’s Health Care System
  15. Ensure All Children Have Health Insurance
  16. Fight Cancer
  17. Supports a Woman’s Right To Choose

You’ll have to read the pdf to get the meat on each of those. But, well, what do you think? Enough? Too much? What would you add? What would remove?

What more do you want to know?

And can you immediately see how John McCain is not an option if you realy intend to improve the status of women and children, on so many levels?

by Jill Miller Zimon at6:50 PM under announcements, barack obama, culture, democrats, health care, parenting, politics, sexism, wh2008, women, youth (Comments)