[Redhorse: this rant’s for you. I know you love it when I get all angry and s**t.]
Sock Obama: started at Plunderbund, now it’s in the New York Magazine among other places.
Hillary The New Republic cover: read the debate here
English-only bills: picked up at TIME Magazine with a lengthy comment thread
I will not link to the Obama sock monkey “doll” website. Just know that many bloggers of different colors have written about it and, as I would have bet $1 million on, people are saying crap like they said about sexist stuff that went down with Hillary Clinton: “Racism? (Sexism?) What racism? (What sexism?) How is that racist? (How is that sexist?)” and the English-only bill: “Anti-immigrant? What do you mean anti-immigrant? How is that anti-immigrant?”
People: this is why we don’t do the hierarchy of oppression but we work to get rid of it ALL. Within ourselves (by becoming anti-racist, anti-sexist, anti-anti-immigrant - I’m not even sure if that’s what it’s officially called but IT DOESN’T MATTER - it’s your behavior and attitudes that matter) and calling it out when others do it. Not by saying, “ha! you think that’s so bad? You should see THIS!” or by saying, “oh I know - it’s awful - but it happens.”
But by calling it out. And writing and saying over and over and over: IT. IS. WRONG.
Feel like slapping people down for selective outrage? Guess what? There’s so much of this crap out there now that it’s pretty tough to catch it all. I’m okay with that - especially on a blog where I know others will point it out.
And what if you don’t get any of those associations? Well, I do doubt whether some people ever will. Which makes me wonder, what are people learning - and where - that makes them unable to see this stuff as wrong? Where is the kinder, gentler nation of people? Where is the “if I don’t stand up for them now, who will stand up for me later” ethic in people?
Hmm, wait. Think having a president who calls other countries’ presidents names, regularly, as a matter of course and in the media as his brand of diplomacy has anything to do with setting an example? Nah.
Seven deadly sins proliferating everywhere. How about some virtues, people?
Here’s a reminder - what have you been practicing lately:
Sins:
luxuria (extravagance, later lust), gula (gluttony), avaritia (greed), acedia (sloth), ira (wrath), invidia (envy), and superbia (pride)
Virtues:
- Chastity (Latin, Castitas) (purity, opposes Lust, Latin Luxuria):
Embracing of moral wholesomeness and achieving purity of body and thought through education and betterment.
- Temperance (Latin, Temperantia) (self-control, opposes Gluttony, Latin Gula):
Practicing self-control, abstention, and moderation.
- Charity (Latin, Liberalitas) (will, generosity, opposes Greed, Latin Avaritia):
Generosity. Willingness to give. A nobility of thought or actions.
- Diligence (Latin, Industria) (ethics, opposes Sloth, Latin Acedia):
A zealous and careful nature in one’s actions and work. Decisive work ethic. Budgeting one’s time; monitoring one’s own activities to guard against laziness. Putting forth full concentration in one’s work
- Kindness (Latin, Humanitas) (peace, opposes Wrath, Latin Ira):
Forbearance and endurance through moderation. Resolving conflicts peacefully, as opposed to resorting to violence. The ability to forgive; to show mercy to sinners.
- Humility (Latin, Humilitas) (modesty, opposes Pride, Latin Superbia):
Modest behavior, selflessness, and the giving of respect. Giving credit where credit is due; not unfairly glorifying one’s own self.
Okay. Let’s just say it - what the hell is wrong with people? Who can’t care about other people’s feelings? Who place protecting themselves and preserving their paradigms above everything else to the point of exclusion and hatred? Who can’t admit what they don’t know and then seek to figure it out rather than just assume and speculate and be done with it or worse, goad people into mind games rather than just debating? No one knows everything. Talk, ask, question, LISTEN.
Enough.
Get yourself to a church, synagogue, mosque or quiet space and figure out what is WRONG with you instead of blathering about what is wrong with everyone else. Yes - I am saying that there is something wrong with a person who does not see the racism, sexism or anti-immigrant nature in the things I’ve mentioned.
To see it, by the way, does not mean you have to agree with the perspective. It doesn’t mean that you have to also not see the other perspectives of how other people see those things. It only means that you can imagine what other people are seeing that is wrong and you are choosing to say, “Well, you know, I can see how you see it that way. But I don’t.”
What’s the value in that? Because you then hope that when such prejudicial junk comes their way or happens to someone they know or love, they will recognize it - and this is how we work to build empathy where there is none. Understanding where there isn’t any.
Because right now? We got a boatload of not-understanding - and not caring that they don’t understand - dragging us down. And we will sink. We absolutely will.
Talk about feh.